Thomas Torrance and St. Augustine in Conversation: Creatio ex Nihilo and imago Dei

Matthew Drever in the Harvard Theological Review offers a nice argument using a doctrine of creation and the imago Dei to dispel the common misunderstanding about Augustine’s so called psychological conception of the Trinity; i.e. the inner structure of anthropology (mind, will, affections) served as the lens by which Augustine supposedly conceived of the inner relation of God’s life as Triune—so a sort of proto-social-Trinitarianism. In order to understand augustine2Drever’s full argument, and how he utilizes Christian conceptions of creation and imago Dei, you will have to read his essay in full.

Within Drever’s essay, and as he is dispelling said myth, as I already noted, he engages with the imago Dei as a lens through which to reify Augustine’s understanding of the movement from God to creation, and how that is mediated through the images (humans) of the image (the Son, Jesus) in the soteriological combine (so to speak). And it is this that I find very resonant with my own Torrancean understanding of the primacy of Christ as the ground and condition of what it means to be human, and in fact “saved” or reconciled to God—which then funds human conception (as conceived from the Christ as the imago Dei, simpliciter) in regard to God, and the economy of His triune life. Here is how Drever opens his comments on imago Dei in Augustine:

[A]ccording to Augustine, all creation receives its order—its essence, or definition—through the Son. For most of creation this order comes via the rationes or ideas, eternally held within the Son, which are infused in creation as the rationes seminales. These seminal ideas provide the pre-established structure that governs the coming into existence of material objects. The order imposed on material creation through these ideas allows for the delineation of creation into a genus/species framework. Humans, however, are unique in material creation in that their order—essence, definition—does not follow pre-established rationes seminales, but rather arises through their turning to and recognition of God. This is what it means for humans to be created according to the image and likeness of God. One consequence of this is that the essence of human nature cannot be understood within the genus/species paradigm that orders the rest of the material creation. The true essence of human nature is defined (if this term remains appropriate) by how it images God, and not the one God of Plotinus but the Trinity—”man is the image of the Trinity.”

Augustine is careful to differentiate the way the Son images God from the way in which humans do so. This is an important distinction, and one in which the key Nicene trinitarian themes of divine simplicity, inseparable operation, and unchangeability are operative. The Son is distinct from creation precisely because the Son is God as the Father is God. The Son is unchanging wisdom and blessedness as the Father is (and so also the Spirit). Augustine, being the close reader that he is, contrasts this with humans who are according to the image rather than the image itself. One way of parsing this distinction is in terms of the doctrine of creatio ex nihilo. In Gen. litt., Augustine describes the human imaging of God at creation as the turning of humans to God and compares it with the redemptive turning of humans back to God that occurs though [sic] the Word. In both instances, this turning is a movement away from nothingness. In the latter case, it is a turning from the moral nothingness of sin; in the former case, it is a turning from the nothingness out of which all finite existence arises.

This has significant consequences for understanding the project of Trin. If the true essence of human nature is the imago Dei and this is given in the turning of humans to God from the nothingness out of which they were created, then the resources available within the self for understanding God are also given in this turning to God. The self opens to God or to nothing, so that apart from God the self has no real or true form through which to understand God. Hence, Augustine’s inward turn into the self has as its precondition God’s self-revelatory actions of creating and redeeming the self, in which God is revealed as the triune God. [Matthew Drever, “The Self Before God? Rethinking Augustine’s Trinitarian Thought,”  Harvard Theological Review/Volume 100/Issue 02/April 2007, pp. 240-41.]

So for Augustine, Christ is the key, and not in an overly neo-Platonized and psychologized philosophical way, but in a Christian, Christic way.

I will place this into conversation with Thomas Torrance’s conception of things with Augustine (as described by Drever), at a later date. There are some significant parallels here.

Advertisements

2 comments

  1. Very interesting, thanks. Question, and maybe this will be anwered when you post concerning Torrance’s thoughts, but do you think that the “image of God” has nothing to do with our abilities/being (e.g., personal, communication, intelligence, creative, etc.) or do you think these are contemplated in Drever’s or Augustine’s “then the resources available within the self for understanding God are also given in this turning to God.”?

    Like

  2. Steve, no, I think imago Dei does, but that Christ is the image of God for us (whose image we have been recreated in, so we are images of the image, and our knowledege of God is centered in Christ then as the image, which we are united to be the grace of God’s life in him … I see the way Augustine being construed here in very similar ways, although not as explicitly or radically Christic).

    Like

Comments are closed.