I’ve written against theologies of glory ever since (and before) I heard of them. A life verse of mine (among a gazillion) is the following: “For I’ve determined to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and Him crucified.” This typifies the staurological life I live the Christian as, from the cruciformed life of the risen Christ’s (or at least the one I aim for). Because of this I have an acute allergy to anyone who chooses instead to be a theologian of glory. Jesus identifies theologians of glory this way: “I do not receive honor from men. But I know you, that you do not have the love of God in you. I have come in My Father’s name, and you do not receive Me; if another comes in his own name, him you will receive. How can you believe, who receive honor from one another, and do not seek the honor that comes from the only God?” (John 5.41-4) He also has theologians of glory in mind here: “Take heed that you do not do your charitable deeds before men, to be seen by them. Otherwise you have no reward from your Father in heaven. Therefore, when you do a charitable deed, do not sound a trumpet before you as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory from men. Assuredly, I say to you, they have their reward. But when you do a charitable deed, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, that your charitable deed may be in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will Himself reward you openly.” (Mt. 6.1-4) These characteristics, where the person seeks praise from other men, rather than God, these typify theologians of glory. I rebuke that; I say ‘get behind me satan,’ when I encounter such putrid displays of self-seeking and glorification; whether I see that creep in myself or others.
When this hits close to home, particularly with someone, or others who are supposedly your friends, your colleagues in the theological task, this becomes that much more difficult to stomach. It leaves you feeling disillusioned, wondering just how farcical so much of your time and energy might have been because you were unknowingly associating yourself with theologians of glory. I just had a really hard example of this hit me, one that hit very close to home. I’ve been entertaining the idea of putting a particular person on blast, and I have, in muted ways, on Facebook and Twitter, but putting them on the public and open world wide web for the whole world to see just how gross a theology of glory looks in real life living color. But I have chosen not to do that here now. Some people have been giving me grief, either by omission or commission, in regard to the honorary doctor of theology I received. You see, theologians of glory get really concerned about optics. They think that if you receive an honorary ThD from an internationally based denominational consortium of theological schools, that the degree itself isn’t worth much; that in fact, it is a fraudulent degree not worth the paper it’s printed on. If the school that awards you said degree isn’t a White Euro/Americo/Westerno school with grand tradition, deep funding sources, with name recognition among all the elites in the world, that the school is pretty much worthless. In fact, if you can’t find said school on a superficial google search, then the theologian of glory feels free to call you out for the whole world to see. You see, the theologian of glory knows that they have already been sanctioned to do that, they have all the rich White elites standing behind them; yeah, the paper they have hanging on their wall, and their published dissertations that five people might have read says so.
Ultimately, the problem with theologians of glory is that they have drunk the theological industrial complex’s kool-aid. Indeed, they are so drunk on themselves, and their various accolades, they think they are so smart and couth, that they believe the whole world ought to simply get down on their knees and kiss their feet with every step taken. In other words, theologians of glory are deluded by their own echo-chambers. They have been called “the Dr.” for so long, they have become the go-to guys and gals so much in their respective institutions of higher learning, that they simply believe everyone ought to worship the ground they stand on; and the amazing thing about the theologian of glory, is that they will take this attitude all in the name of Jesus. They will claim to be doctors in service of the Church. Indeed, this is the most deluding factor for the theologian of glory. Their self-projected, self-elevated statuses have become so conflated with Christ that they can no longer distinguish between the real Jesus, and the Jesus they say they are witnessing for. They believe they can talk skubalon about others who they think are not their equals, and in fact they think they ought to talk about others in service of the Church. Until a person jumps through the hoops they had to, you know, to become a theologian of glory, these guys and gals, in their hallowed halls, look upon the rest of the Christian world as the plebians that they are.
The moral of this story is this: only be a theologian of glory if you’re interested in receiving all of your praise and rewards and unbelief right now. Once the eschaton hits, and the Bema judgment comes, all of those rewards will be burnt up and judged as the straw that they are. Sure, you’ll be ‘saved,’ but as by fire; and Grandma Ethel’s rulership in the Kingdom will be multiple times greater than the theologian of glory, and his/her rulership. But that’s the sobering thing about everything: we are talking about eternal verities. We are talking about magnifying Jesus, and only genuine theologians of the cross do that; theologians of glory mock the “least of these,” and they do so in the name of Jesus Christ—a stricter judgment awaits.
I’m thankful that the justice of God is served in his righteousness. (My own sense of “justice” has and often does tempt me to effect “a just reward” that has no basis in true righteousness.)
LikeLike
Hi Bobby, it is a truly heartbreaking reality that the pharisaical attitude that Jesus critiqued in his own day is evidenced in those who claim to do theology in his name. However, I can’t help but wonder at the offense you seem to have taken from those who have given you grief. I admit I’m not privy to all the details (though reading between the lines and seeing some of your recent tweets that have helped explain what is occurring), it seems to me that your reaction to their failure, or refusal, to attribute to you the credit you believe this honorary doctorate deserves ironically stems from the very desire for recognition for which you lambast the theologians of glory. I want to be careful as to not sound judgmental myself, but wouldn’t a theologian-of-the-cross response, at this point, be like that of the apostle Paul in 1 Corinthians 4:3-4: “But with me it is a very small thing that I should be judged by you or by any human court. In fact, I do not even judge myself. For I am not aware of anything against myself, but I am not thereby acquitted. It is the Lord who judges me”? Apart from feeling disillusioned, or possibly even betrayed (which are terrible feelings indeed), why not simply shrug off these criticisms and move on? Why the need to publicly denounce them? Will not God judge at the right time? Will he not vindicate you if you are in the right? Why entertain the idea of blasting someone on social media, unless that person has touched a sensitive nerve about which you feel insecure and for which you are actually looking for the same recognition that you criticize them for seeking? Just some thoughts as I read your post, written out of a spirit of brotherly love.
LikeLike
Jonny there is more much more to this than I have shared. It’s the level of the supposed relationship—investment of time etc that doesn’t allow for it to simply be a matter of “shrugging it off.” Plus, this doesn’t just implicate me, but those who gave me the award and the institutions they represent (and all the people and the demographic they represent). So no, this runs deeper, deeper than you’re privy to in this situation; and I’m still not sharing all the circumstances here. It isn’t a matter of me wanting recognition from these people per se. It’s a matter of “why” they are withholding it in the first place that is of sickening issue. Are you familiar with the inner-dynamics of the academic world? If I really was driven towards the type of recognition you theorize, I would have made the financial sacrifice to get the PhD years ago, that isn’t it.
LikeLike
Richard, amen to that. These matters are always sensitive to share. And often too complex for people to really understand what’s going on behind the scenes. But of course this has been a place where I have always vented. The bottom line is that there is a pervasive rot in theological academic complex that I have encountered over and over and over again. To the point that I must speak out against it, even if it implicates me at certain levels too.
LikeLike
Like I said in my comment, I am aware there are other things involved, and so I wanted to avoid sounding judgmental without having all the relevant information. It was just how it all appeared to me on the surface. That’s all. I am somewhat familiar with the dynamics of the academic world, at least enough to keep me away from it.
LikeLike
And as far as blasting, it’s the same reason that Paul blasted Peter for. It’s because calling things out in the abstract when they are done in public (which this has been) is not the Christian way.
LikeLike
Being passive when actual and identifiable rot is present is not the way I live the Christian life. It clearly is the way most in the Church attempt to live, and that has turned out just smashingly. No thanks.
LikeLike
It’s always risky to share personal matters like this. But that typically doesn’t keep me from doing it. I kept names out of it here. People who know me better and on the other platforms got to see this play out firsthand, and they thought it was sad and disgusting.
LikeLike